TrialSignal
Clinical trial intelligence report
Tactile Versus Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Ablation in Cases of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
Source-linked diligence brief with registry provenance, taxonomy normalization and premium analytical context.
Generated
Jun 24, 2026
Report code
NCT02248194-Jun 24, 2026
NCT ID
NCT02248194
Status
COMPLETED
Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
Mostafa Hussein
Executive brief
Investment-Ready Snapshot
The clinical trial compares the efficacy and safety of Tactile Electrosurgical Ablation (TEA) against traditional Hysteroscopic Electrosurgical Ablation for treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women aged 40-50. Given that DUB affects up to 30% of women during their reproductive years, there is a significant market opportunity for effective, less invasive treatments. TEA presents as a cost-effective alternative, particularly in resource-limited settings, which may appeal to healthcare systems facing budget constraints. The trial's completion and positive outcomes could position TEA as a viable competitor to existing surgical options, potentially influencing treatment guidelines and expanding market share in gynecological interventions.
Source & freshness
Provenance
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02248194
Indication
Dysfunction Uterine Bleeding
Modality
medical device
Target
Tactile electrosurgical ablation (TEA) technique for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB)
Intervention
Tactile electrosurgical ablation probe, Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation
Source record
Protocol Description
Detailed source ingestion pending.
Source record
Outcome Measures
Detailed source ingestion pending.
Source record
Eligibility
Detailed source ingestion pending.
AI analysis
Known Results And Readout Context
Detailed source ingestion pending.
IP intelligence
Patent And IP Landscape
Detailed source ingestion pending.
Source record
Contacts
Detailed source ingestion pending.